What gets called mental disorder or illness, mild or severe, shows itself as a misplaced fear of others. Personal relationships break down, followed by an inability to form and maintain new ones. The sufferer becomes progressively more emotionally and cognitively isolated. Madness results from our failure to constantly update and modify our mental map of the world. If we do not ‘test’ our predictions, beliefs, dreams, thoughts, internal dialogue, fantasies, hypotheses, plans, ideas about how the world is, and what the people within it think and feel, our map becomes rapidly out of date. If we act with an out of date model of the world - we will look mad to others, and they will treat us as mad. If others don’t share a large part of our model of reality we are emotionally and cognitively isolated. We need an accurate map; by sharing we come to have a more complete understanding than we could ever achieve alone. The ability to doubt and live with uncertainty, and hence know that we must constantly test our vision of the world - is sanity. To control and fix our view is the first step on the road to disaster and the way an unchanging outlook is maintained is by isolating oneself from any evidence that might contradict it. An unmodified and out of date model of the world is one where our thoughts and feelings are anchored in the past, hence our predictions of the future may be hopelessly wrong.



Wednesday 20 January 2010

What is social neuroscience?



Neuroscience has expanded hugely in the last fifteen years or so since researchers have been able to buy time on hospital fMRI scanners during off-peak periods. By attaching ever more sophisticated computer technology, it has become possible to collect data that promises to close a major ‘missing link’ - between how the brain and behaviour of one person, influences that of another - how the physical science of the human body links to the psychological and the sociological. How the verbal and nonverbal communication of one person becomes that of another. Equally the results show a trend towards the brain being much more flexible, adaptive and capable of new learning (in all age groups) than was previously thought. Indeed the key question to ask now may well be; how do people manage to stick to habits and routines which narrow the possibilities of their lives when their brains have the capacity to do otherwise?


(Most neuroscientists proceed on the assumption that Darwinian evolution by natural selection applies to the human species - both biologically and culturally; or to phrase it differently; the rules of evolution apply to the maturation of the physical structure of an individual brain, plus all it’s acquired contents - all the learnt stuff!)

So researchers are now talking tentatively about a social neuroscience; how the daily physical experience of the world of others maps into the creation and growth of new connections in the brain leading to the strengthening or weakening of neural pathways (a physical process of chemical encoding) and of course, how it all comes out again before proceeding into someone else’s brain.

Asking ‘why?’ type causal questions, or trying to attribute agency becomes increasingly pointless. Rather we should stick to ‘how?’ When someone makes an assertion, the right response really is; who told you that? Nothing written on my blog is original, it’s just a series of links - OK! (And how come all these brain scientists are into eastern philosophies and meditation?)

Start with two very short TED talks; first Chris deCharms
http://www.ted.com/talks/christopher_decharms_scans_the_brain_in_real_time.html then proceed to the mighty ‘Rama’ http://www.ted.com/talks/vs_ramachandran_the_neurons_that_shaped_civilization.html For a good written introduction go to Daniel Goleman’s Social Intelligence http://www.amazon.co.uk/Social-Intelligence-Science-Human-Relationships/dp/0099464926/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1263909589&sr=1-1 (he finally got the right title for a book!)

No comments:

Post a Comment